You put 168 chemicals on your skin every day

Before you’ve left the house in the morning, you’re chemically overloaded

According to research conducted by the Environmental Working Group, the average woman uses around 12 personal care products per day, exposing herself to approximately 168 different chemical ingredients on a daily basis.

Most people have become increasingly intentional about what they consume internally. They filter their water, remove processed foods, prioritise organic produce, and invest heavily in gut health and metabolic optimisation. Yet there remains a major blind spot that quietly bypasses all of this effort, and that is what is being applied directly onto the skin.

This exposure is accumalates and the skin is not an inert outer shell acting purely as a barrier between you and the external world. It is a biologically active organ with the ability to absorb, metabolise, and interact with compounds applied to its surface. Research in dermatology has demonstrated that certain substances, particularly those that are lipid-soluble or low molecular weight, can penetrate the skin barrier and enter systemic circulation. This means that what you apply topically does not necessarily remain external.

This is why our topical magnesium is so impactful at a transdermal level. As it enters the bloodstream via the skin barrier, and has a significantly higher success rate for nutrient absorption compared to pill-form. Most notably because we have a chronic epidemic of poor mineral absorption, leaky gut syndrome, and bad gut health overall.

The problem is not simply that these chemicals exist, but that exposure is chronic, cumulative, and largely unconscious. Each product may appear insignificant on its own, but when layered repeatedly across days, months, and years, the body is subjected to a constant stream of low-dose chemical signals. Unlike acute toxicity, which is immediate and obvious, this type of exposure operates subtly, gradually influencing biological systems over time without immediate feedback, making it far more difficult to recognise and address.


Why Daily Exposure Matters More Than You Think

Traditional toxicology is built upon the principle that the dose determines the poison, implying that small exposures are largely insignificant. However, endocrine-disrupting chemicals do not follow this linear model in the way most people assume. Hormones operate at extremely low concentrations within the body, often in parts per billion or trillion, meaning even small external interferences can have disproportionate biological effects. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences has highlighted that low-dose endocrine disruptor exposure can alter hormone signalling, particularly with repeated contact.

This becomes particularly concerning when you consider that exposure through skincare is not intermittent but constant. Each morning routine, each evening routine, each reapplication of products adds another layer of chemical input. Over time, this creates what can be described as a persistent biochemical background noise, forcing the endocrine system to continually adapt to external interference. The body is not designed to process hundreds of synthetic compounds daily, and yet for many individuals, this has now become the norm.

The concept of cumulative burden is critical here. Many of these compounds are either stored within tissues, repeatedly reintroduced, or capable of interacting with one another in ways that amplify their biological effects. This phenomenon, often referred to as the “cocktail effect,” suggests that the combined impact of multiple chemicals may be greater than the sum of their individual effects. In simple terms, it is not just what you are exposed to, but how often and in what combinations.


Blame The Endocrine Disruptors

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, commonly referred to as EDCs, are substances that interfere with the body’s hormonal communication system. These chemicals have the ability to mimic natural hormones, block receptor sites, alter hormone production, and disrupt the timing and sensitivity of hormonal signals. Hormones themselves act as chemical messengers, coordinating everything from metabolism and reproduction to mood, cognition, and energy production. When this system is disrupted, the consequences are rarely isolated to a single function .

Parabens and phthalates, two of the most commonly used compounds in personal care products, have been extensively studied for their endocrine-disrupting potential. Research has demonstrated that parabens can exhibit oestrogenic activity by binding to hormone receptors, while phthalates have been linked to disruptions in androgen signalling and reproductive development. These interactions may seem subtle in isolation, but when exposure is continuous, they can create long-term shifts in hormonal balance.

What makes endocrine disruption particularly insidious is that it does not always produce immediate or obvious symptoms. Instead, it can manifest gradually through subtle changes in metabolic function, fertility, mood regulation, thyroid activity, or inflammatory processes. This delayed feedback makes it difficult for individuals to connect their daily habits with long-term physiological changes, allowing the underlying disruption to persist unnoticed.

The Fragrance Loophole: A Hidden Chemical Cocktail

One of the most overlooked aspects of modern skincare is the use of the term “fragrance” or “parfum” on ingredient labels. While it appears as a single, simple ingredient, it can legally represent a complex mixture of hundreds or even thousands of undisclosed chemical compounds due to trade secret protections within the cosmetics industry. This lack of transparency makes it virtually impossible for consumers to fully understand what they are being exposed to.

Studies analysing fragrance compositions have identified the presence of endocrine disruptors, allergens, and compounds capable of affecting neurological and immune function. The concern is not limited to a single ingredient but to the interaction of multiple compounds within a single formulation. When applied daily, these mixtures become a consistent source of chemical exposure that bypasses conscious awareness entirely, yet may still exert measurable biological effects.

The issue here is not simply one of regulation, but of perception. Consumers are conditioned to associate fragrance with cleanliness, luxury, and desirability, without questioning the underlying chemical complexity. In reality, fragrance often represents one of the most concentrated sources of undisclosed synthetic exposure within a typical skincare routine, making it one of the highest leverage areas to address.

Parabens and Phthalates: Small Molecules, Significant Hormonal Impact

Parabens are widely used as preservatives to prevent microbial growth and extend product shelf life. However, their structural similarity to oestrogen allows them to bind to hormone receptors and mimic hormonal activity within the body. Research has identified parabens in human breast tissue, raising concerns about their potential role in hormone-sensitive conditions and long-term endocrine disruption. While their potency is lower than endogenous hormones, chronic exposure creates a persistent signal that the body must continuously process.

Phthalates, on the other hand, are commonly used to stabilise fragrances and improve product texture. These compounds have been linked to reduced testosterone levels, reproductive abnormalities, early puberty, and metabolic dysfunction. What makes phthalates particularly problematic is their ability to remain largely hidden within ingredient lists, often masked under the term “fragrance,” making them difficult to identify and avoid without deliberate awareness.

Together, these compounds represent a significant portion of the chemical burden associated with personal care products. Their effects are not isolated to one system but extend across reproductive, metabolic, and neurological pathways, contributing to a broader pattern of systemic imbalance over time. The concern is not rooted in acute toxicity but in chronic, repeated exposure at levels that subtly alter biological function.

The Mitochondrial Layer: Where Energy Meets Toxic Load

Beyond hormonal disruption, there is a deeper layer to this conversation that is rarely addressed, and that is the impact of chemical exposure on mitochondrial function. Mitochondria are responsible for producing energy within the cell, regulating oxidative balance, and supporting cellular repair processes. They are also highly sensitive to environmental stressors, including chemical toxins and endocrine disruptors.

Research has shown that certain environmental chemicals can increase oxidative stress, disrupt mitochondrial respiration, and impair energy production at the cellular level. When mitochondria are compromised, the effects extend far beyond fatigue. They influence inflammation, recovery capacity, hormonal regulation, and overall metabolic efficiency. This creates a state where the body is operating under a reduced energetic capacity, even if outwardly everything appears normal.

This is where many individuals begin to experience subtle but persistent symptoms such as low energy, poor recovery, hormonal imbalances, and a general sense of physiological “friction.” These are not always linked back to a single cause but are often the result of cumulative stress placed on the system over time. Chemical exposure through skincare is one piece of that puzzle, but it is a piece that is both constant and often overlooked.

10 Products to Be Mindful Of (And What to Use Instead)

1. Deodorant / Antiperspirant

Be mindful of: Aluminium compounds, synthetic fragrance, parabens.

Antiperspirants work by blocking sweat glands, interfering with a natural detoxification pathway. Many also contain fragrance blends that may include phthalates and other endocrine disruptors.

Use instead: Natural deodorants using magnesium, baking soda (if tolerated), or zinc-based formulations. Fragrance-free or organic essential oil-based options are ideal.

2. Body Wash & Shower Gel

Be mindful of: Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), synthetic fragrance, parabens

These products are applied across large surface areas of the skin daily, increasing total chemical exposure. Many are designed to foam aggressively, which often requires harsher surfactants.

Use instead: Simple, low-tox formulations with minimal ingredients. Look for sulfate-free cleansers and fragrance-free or essential oil-based products.

3. Moisturiser & Body Lotion

Be mindful of: Parabens, fragrance, petroleum derivatives

Moisturisers are designed to stay on the skin for extended periods, meaning absorption potential is higher. Many contain unnecessary fillers and synthetic compounds.

Use instead: Products based on natural oils and butters such as shea butter, jojoba oil, or tallow-based formulations. Minimal ingredient lists are key.

4. Shampoo & Conditioner

Be mindful of: Fragrance, silicones, parabens, sulfates

Your scalp is highly vascular, meaning absorption potential is significant. Many shampoos contain a cocktail of chemicals designed for texture and scent rather than biological compatibility.

Use instead: Gentle, sulfate-free formulas with clearly listed ingredients. Avoid heavy fragrance. Look for simpler, more natural compositions.

5. Skincare (Face Wash, Serums, Creams)

Be mindful of: Fragrance, preservatives, synthetic fillers, SLS, Propelyn Gycol

Facial skincare is often layered, meaning multiple products compound exposure. The skin on your face is also thinner and more absorbent than other areas.

Use instead: Streamlined routines with minimal ingredients. Focus on quality over quantity. Choose brands that prioritise ingredient transparency and avoid unnecessary complexity.

6. Sunscreen

Be mindful of: Chemical SPF and UV filters such as oxybenzone and octinoxate

Some chemical sunscreens have been shown to be absorbed into the bloodstream and may exhibit endocrine-disrupting effects, they’ve also been shown to be carcogenic and to block the bodies ability to absorb Vitamin D.

Use instead: Mineral-based sunscreens using zinc oxide are much better. These sit on the skin rather than being absorbed and are generally considered safer.

7. Perfume / Fragrance

Be mindful of: Anything labelled “fragrance” or “parfum”

This is one of the most concentrated sources of hidden chemical exposure. A single fragrance can contain hundreds of undisclosed compounds.

Use instead: Organic Essential oil-based perfumes or remove fragrance altogether. This is one of the highest leverage changes you can make.

8. Toothpaste & Oral Care

Be mindful of: Fluoride, synthetic flavouring, triclosan, SLS, Glycerin

Oral care products are used daily and can be absorbed through the gums and oral tissues.

Use instead: Simpler formulations with minimal ingredients. Look for fluoride-free options if aligned with your approach, go for a hydroxyapatite based tooth paste if available.

9. Makeup (Foundation, Concealer, Lip Products)

Be mindful of: Heavy metals, fragrance, preservatives

Makeup is often worn for long periods, increasing exposure time. Lip products are particularly important, as they can be ingested.

Use instead: Cleaner beauty brands that prioritise transparency and avoid unnecessary chemical fillers. Focus on reducing daily use where possible.

10. Household Cleaning Products

Be mindful of: Synthetic fragrance, harsh chemicals, aerosolised toxins

While not applied directly to the skin, these products contribute to overall chemical load through inhalation and indirect contact.

Use instead: Simple cleaning agents such as vinegar, baking soda, castile soap, and non-toxic formulations. Reduce airborne chemical exposure where possible.

 

References
1. Environmental Working Group (EWG) – Personal care product exposure
2. Bos & Meinardi (2000) – Skin penetration research
3. NIEHS – Endocrine disruptors and low-dose effects
4. Gore et al. (2015) – EDCs and human health
5. Darbre & Harvey (2008) – Parabens and endocrine activity
6. Safe Cosmetics – Fragrance disclosure laws
7. Darbre et al. (2004) – Parabens in breast tissue
8. Swan (2008) – Phthalates and reproductive health
9. Trasande et al. (2013) – Phthalates and metabolic disease
10. Kortenkamp (2007) – Chemical mixture effects
11. Meyer et al. (2013) – Mitochondria and environmental toxins

Want to be notified when we publish new articles?

You’ll also be the first to hear about new launches, special drops, and exclusive updates.